On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
>>>>> static int __init nf_conntrack_proto_dccp_init(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int err;
>>>>> - err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(&dccp_proto4);
>>>>> + err = register_pernet_gen_device(&dccp_net_id, &dccp_net_ops);
>>>>>
>>> [ cut ]
>>>> Shouldn't it be register_pernet_gen_subsys ?
>>
>> No, I believe. By using register_pernet_gen_device I'm allowed to
>> not modify 'struct net' and friends and keep all I need in my own
>> pointer retrieved thru per-net gen-device id I've registered.
>
> I believe Daniel means, that we need the register_xxx_get_subsys call
> for subsystems, rather than devices, that will behave according to the
> generic net pointers.
>
> Daniel, am I right with this suggestion?
>
...
Ah, yes, just checked register_pernet_gen_subsys -- it's what I need. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
