On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 01:00 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:46:04 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > _Especially_ if > > then the linux-next integrator also plays stupid about basic kernel > > workflow questions ;-) > > He didn't. I suggested to Stephane and Stephen that we get this stuff > into linux-next for a shot at 2.6.29 and that the collective 'we' make > an extra effort to get perfmon over the hump and merged up. > > You missed that email, missed the presence of perfmon in linux-next > and repeatedly chose to not review the perfmon patch series when it went > past. > > So here we all are. It just seems to me that CC-ing the intended 'we' at that point would have saved a lot of grief. Stuffing 2.3k lines of code in without the maintainers ACK is not something we do each day, and I can understand them getting miffed about that. I think every maintainer would consider such an action plain rude. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
