* Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ingo Molnar writes: > > > We know and knew about the existence of the perfmon patches, but they > > were always in the vague RFC category and never directly submitted or > > Cc:-ed to us. > > So at least now we have your attention. :) > > The best thing now might be for Stephane to do a patch set with the > perfmon3 core + powerpc bits. I'd be happy to take that through my > tree, and I really want to see perfmon3 get upstream. X86 can > follow whenever you can get some time to take a look at it. Sounds sensible. x86 doesnt always have to be the guinea pig for new kernel features :) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
