On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:33:29PM -0400, J.R. Mauro wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:04:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: > >> > >> In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77: > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation' > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet': > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER' > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask': > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64' > >> > >> I applied the following patch. > > > > Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the > > tree, thanks. > > Greg, > > The slicoss driver also from Alacritech looks like it needs a depends > on X86 as well. Should the sxg and slicoss drivers from Alacritech be > doing things like this (sxg/sxghif.h:851, slicoss/slicoss.c:960): Yes, it needs it too. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
