On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:27:12 +0200 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > @@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ static void *disk_seqf_next(struct seq_f > > struct device *dev; > > > > (*pos)++; > > + if (seqf->private == NULL) > > + return NULL; > > dev = class_dev_iter_next(seqf->private); > > if (dev) > > return dev_to_disk(dev); > > Ehh... next can't be called with NULL private. My computer disagreed ;) > Where can I take a look > at the merged tree? There have been two separate changes to that area > of code. Ad-hoc behavior fix for 2.6.27 and general clean up scheduled > for 2.6.28 and the two use seqf->private for different purposes. Maybe > the two got mixed up? It's linux-next-20080903 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
