Andrew Morton wrote: > @@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ static void *disk_seqf_next(struct seq_f > struct device *dev; > > (*pos)++; > + if (seqf->private == NULL) > + return NULL; > dev = class_dev_iter_next(seqf->private); > if (dev) > return dev_to_disk(dev); Ehh... next can't be called with NULL private. Where can I take a look at the merged tree? There have been two separate changes to that area of code. Ad-hoc behavior fix for 2.6.27 and general clean up scheduled for 2.6.28 and the two use seqf->private for different purposes. Maybe the two got mixed up? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
