On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:22:29 +0100, xerces8 wrote: > You can ask the ISP for more real IP addresses and then use one for the > VoIP client. > > In our country*, many ISPs give 2-4 IP addresses by default. > > Regards, > David > > * - Slovenia > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mateus Interciso <p.zarnick@xxxxxxxxx> To: > linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Network sharing > without using NAT, possible? > >> Hi all, I currently using iptables NAT for routing the internet trough >> 2 different sub-networks, and we are having some trouble with the NAT, >> specially for VoIP, so I was thinking if it's possible to make a >> router (like a CISCO IOS) using Zebra, that will, in other words, share >> the Internet trough the sub-networks, without using NAT, or in a better >> way. The question for this, is that we had a w2k3 server sharing the >> internet, and the VoIP was fine, since we changed the w2k3 for a Linux >> Box, the VoIP started acting very strangely, and I'm really running out >> of options here to make it fix, I though about this, is it possible? >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Zarnick >> >> - >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info >> at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info > at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html I'm starting to think, it may be easier if I set up the Linux box as a bridge, just for firewalling, and put the w2k3 server back again as routing, this would get rid of the Linux NAT, still leave me with the firewall, and routing stuff, what do you guys think? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
