Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



xerces8 wrote:
You can ask the ISP for more real IP addresses and then use one for the VoIP
client.

In our country*, many ISPs give 2-4 IP addresses by default.

Regards,
David

* - Slovenia

-----Original Message-----
From: Mateus Interciso <p.zarnick@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?

Hi all, I currently using iptables NAT for routing the internet trough 2 different sub-networks, and we are having some trouble with the NAT, specially for VoIP, so I was thinking if it's possible to make a router (like a CISCO IOS) using Zebra, that will, in other words, share the Internet trough the sub-networks, without using NAT, or in a better way. The question for this, is that we had a w2k3 server sharing the internet, and the VoIP was fine, since we changed the w2k3 for a Linux Box, the VoIP started acting very strangely, and I'm really running out of options here to make it fix, I though about this, is it possible?

Thanks a lot.

Zarnick

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



He, unfortunatly, here in Brazil this is almost impossible :'(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux