Re: [patch (take 2)] genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2007/8/6, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Subject: genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers
> >
> > After the "genirq: do not mask interrupts by default" patch interrupts
> > should be disabled not immediately upon request, but after they
> > happen. But, handle_simple_irq() and handle_fasteoi_irq() can skip
> > this once or more if an irq is just serviced (IRQ_INPROGRESS),
> > possibly disrupting a driver's work.
>
> nice fix. I think this is exactly the type of bug we were hoping to be
> able to identify and fix, and it could explain the regression in its
> entirety. The big question - does it fix Marcin's regression?
I'll try this patch tomorrow.

Marcin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux