Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > Al Boldi skrev: > > Should an IP be bound to a dev? > > Well, it is not. All configred IP addresses is available on all IP enabled > interfaces. The minor detail on which interface the IP address was added > only tells where the implicit route to that network should be pointing.. Should the kernel assume any implicit routes? > It is quite interesting that you do not see the message when only using > bonding without bridgeing. I have no explanation why you are not seeing > this message when using bonding only. Tcpdump on bridge0 shows the packet looping. Tcpdump on bond0 shows the packet looping. Tcpdump on eth0 shows the packet go out, but tcpdump on eth1 does not show it comming back in?! -- Al - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
