Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We just wanted to be sure of the implementation against the official BicTCP versions and that it was a real bug.

We are particularly concerned that the deployment of these experimental protocols (and they're not even RFCs) are too premature and that we think that they should be switched OFF by default to prevent undesirable consequences to network stability. One concern is that such protocols will steal (sometimes a lot of) bandwidth from normal network traffic.

We wrote the paper as we (amongst others) are in the process of rigourously validating and testing these TCP proposals over a wide range of network environments There are also numerous other proposals around (HSTCP, ScalableTCP, HTCP, FAST etc) that we are also testing and we would be more than happy to provide patches (excluding FAST) and experimental results as they become available.

Yee.


On Feb 21, 2005, at 15:50, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

Yes, this looks like a bug, let me verify it first.
Why did you sit on this so long and go to all the trouble of making a paper out of it?



- : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux