Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yee-Ting Li <Yee-Ting.Li@xxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:50:15 -0800
Cc: linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, end2end-interest@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Douglas Leith <doug.leith@xxxxxxx>, Richard Hughes-Jones <r.hughes-jones@xxxxxxxxx>, Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx>, Les Cottrell <cottrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rhee@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <fd9de42cb9cca9589da8a65bb6e719d5@may.ie>
Sender: linux-net-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Yes, this looks like a bug, let me verify it first. Why did you sit on this so long and go to all the trouble of making a paper out of it? - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug
  - From: Yee-Ting Li

Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/via-rhine.c: make a variable static const
Next by Date: Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug
Previous by thread: nfs disk utilization in terms of stress
Next by thread: Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux 802.1Q VLAN] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Git] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News and Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux PCI] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux