On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:47:00 -0800 Brian Buesker <bbuesker@qualcomm.com> wrote: > >I think this is fine, as long as we can be reasonably sure the > >existing apps zero this thing out which I believe they do. > > Yes, racoon and setkey zero this field. > > >What does KAME do to support SPD priorities via PF_KEY, > >does anyone know? > > Looking at the code real quick, it doesn't appear that they actually > support priorities. It looks like each policy always gets inserted at > the end of the list. I could be wrong though as I don't know the code > very well. Looks like the choice is ours and that it is safe, so just use the reserved2 field as originally suggested. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
