On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > my plan is to not have a default route on the underlying interface - > it is a wireless lan segment, not routed, all I do is ping, ssh and > build up an ipsec tunnel (ike, and ip6ip6 packets). So you want to run transport mode ipsec over the ip6ip6 tunnel interface, am I right? Can't you just run tunnel mode ipsec on your wlan without the tunnel interface, or do you need it to bind to etc? > So adding a default route to the tunnel interface will not hurt > anything. Ok. > started racoon on the client. it was a wierd testing cycle, so I guess > i can't reproduce it. But my normal setup gives me about 20-50 Call > Traces during the boot sequence. Once someone has found those issues > and fixed them, I will run bigger tests again. Right now with still so > many xfrm related problems testing is a bit pointless. Ok, let me know if you manage to get a better crash dump. Regards, Ville -- Ville Nuorvala Research Assistant, Institute of Digital Communications, Helsinki University of Technology email: vnuorval@tcs.hut.fi, phone: +358 (0)9 451 5257 - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
