I've been messing with the patch-o-matic/base/dstlimit.patch filter from CVS.
It uses constructs from 2.6 that do not exist in 2.4. For example,
list_for_each_entry_safe() and PDE() are not defined. Its easy enough to hack
them into the code:
#ifndef list_for_each_entry_safe
#define list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, head, member) \
for (pos = list_entry((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member), \
n = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \
&pos->member != (head); \
pos = n, n = list_entry(n->member.next, typeof(*n), member))
#endif
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < 0x020500
static inline struct proc_dir_entry *PDE(const struct inode *inode)
{
return inode->u.generic_ip;
}
#endif
But is this the right way?
--
Tim Gardner - timg@tpi.com
www.tpi.com 406-443-5357
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
