Re: Do we need a reliable multicast in kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> You might want to look at TIPC http://sourceforge.net/projects/tipc
> that is working on reliable cluster communication. 
>
> There are two completely different domains where multicast is important.

To clarify for other readers: TIPC is unrelated to reliable multicast.
It's a alternative protocol to TCP that reduces the number of packets
exchanged for connection setup and teardown.  

> In small cluster environments on a single LAN, the problem has been solved
> many times.

I would use different words: "There have been multiple approaches and
implementations, some of which have even worked (in specific environments)."

> ... the problem remains a research topic
> ... it would be easier to build these complex protocols in userland.

I'll leave that as the bottom-line, take-away message.

-- 
Donald Becker				becker@scyld.com
Scyld Computing Corporation		http://www.scyld.com
914 Bay Ridge Road, Suite 220		Scyld Beowulf cluster system
Annapolis MD 21403			410-990-9993

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux