Re: Do we need a reliable multicast in kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, David S. Miller wrote:

> People on clusters use their own special clustering hardware and
> protocol stacks

And their own operating systems...

> _ANYWAYS_ because ipv4 is too general to serve their
> performance needs.  And I think that is a good thing rather than
> a bad thing.  People should use specialized solutions if that is the
> best way to attack their problem.

Reliable mulitcast is a very basic requirement from all the cluster
softwares and IP is so widely used. I don't think every cluster
implementation needs to write its own protocol stacks from scratch
except those for rigorous network performance.

If Linux can provide one, I bet a big number of people (at least for
Linux cluster people) will use and take advantage of it, if it is
written good enough. :)


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent
Intel Corp.

Zhu Yi (Chuyee)

GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
http://cn.geocities.com/chewie_chuyee/gpg.txt or
$ gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 71C34820
1024D/71C34820 C939 2B0B FBCE 1D51 109A  55E5 8650 DB90 71C3 4820

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux