> If some low-value stuff leaks through then ho-hum, at least it was > on-topic. It is not as if we are unused to low-value content... ;-) > It would be good if pure administrata such as changing the status were > filtered. That should be easy enough. > In fact, there is probably no point in sending anything bugzilla->list apart > from the initial report. If the bug is then pursued via bugzilla then OK. > If is is pursued via email then bugzilla just captures the discussion. OK, but I'm pretty much doing that already. I try to filter out some of the "bugs with no content". So it sounds like the issue is more the loop from email back in. Will see what I can get done - have to schedule some time from the admins. >> 2. email back in. >> >> Email back in is harder, and needs more thought as to how to make it >> easy to use, whilst avoiding logging crap (eg. ensuing flamewars that >> derive from the bug reports, etc). > > Well hopefully people will have the sense to cut the bugzilla address off > the Cc line if it drifts off-topic. Fairy nuff. >> My intuition is to log replies by >> default, and hack off certain threads by hand > > Nah. Just log everything and hack off the crap by larting people. Heh. need to get a good "remote slap protocol" implemented. Perhaps the net guys can write us an RFC for it ;-) M. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
