On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 22:12, David S. Miller wrote: > I'll apply this, the INT64_MAX or whatever ideas are just > stupid. We're saying what "bits" the device supports when > it does DMA, so we should pass in a "bit" mask. however it might be a good idea to define a PCI_DMAMASK_64BIT (and 32 bit) with the right values ?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
