Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: bunk@fs.tum.de
Subject: Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@rustcorp.com.au
In-reply-to: <20030624174811.GW3710@fs.tum.de>
Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org

I'll apply this, the INT64_MAX or whatever ideas are just
stupid.  We're saying what "bits" the device supports when
it does DMA, so we should pass in a "bit" mask.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
  - From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
  - From: Arjan van de Ven

References:
- [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
  - From: Adrian Bunk

Prev by Date: Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
Next by Date: Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
Previous by thread: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
Next by thread: Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux 802.1Q VLAN] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Git] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News and Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux PCI] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux