Re: Route cache performance under stress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



   From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:17:28 -0400 (EDT)

   Aren't the read_lock_irqsave and restore expensive?

If x86 has an inefficient implementation, well... :-)

This can be done without locks, nobody has done the x86 implementation
of that that's all.  I think the x86_64 folks did a lockless version,
I know I did for sparc64 :)

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux