From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:51:57 -0700 Maybe as a configurable option, since it would make tcpdump less useful. Seems like we could kludge it up so that we used the TSC (or whatever that really fast hardware clock is) to provide some relative stamp that could be converted to a time_val later? I have a strange feeling that Ralph's system isn't using TSC and that's why it shows up so high on the profiles :-) TSC do_gettimeofday() is REALLY cheap (TSC read plus a multiply which x86 does in like 5 cycles). Yes, this idea has been tossed around before. But what's funny is that on the bigger boxes, you don't use TSC because amongst the different nodes of the machine they are skewed, so you have to use the ACPI timer or something like that for timestamping. It does seem a bit wasteful to do the gettimeofday when most of the time the result is ignored. (Or, are there things other than tcpdump that need the gettimeofday stamp?) SO_RECVSTAMP, any socket on the machine can ask for this. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
