Re: [PATCH] s/u64/__u64/ in linux/xfrm.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Again, gcc does _NOT_ have __uXX.  It's purely a Linux thing, in
> no way related to gcc or any other compiler.

You're right.  I had my history screwed up, and was thinking gcc
not kernel.

Regardless, I still stand by my point: use the standard C fixed-size
types.  There is no longer a compelling reason to use non-standard
fixed-size types, when we have standard ones, in user-visible headers.

	Jeff



-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux