> -----Original Message----- > From: David S. Miller [mailto:davem@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:21 AM > To: rddunlap@osdl.org > Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com; herbert@gondor.apana.org.au; > linux-net@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] s/u64/__u64/ in linux/xfrm.h > > > > From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> > > Hooray. I agree with that kind of reality. > > > > Dave, what other linux networking headers are acceptable > > for user apps > > to include? > > > > Maybe netlink.h, rtnetlink.h? > > > Yes. While on the subject, what about ethtool.h? It too uses the u<size> kernel style instead of __u<size> and therefore applications using it has to do all kinds of loops and twists to work around that (e.g. ethtool.c, ifenslave.c). -- | Shmulik Hen | | Israel Design Center (Jerusalem) | | LAN Access Division | | Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. | - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
