On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT) "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote: > I believe you. > > Then what does that comment above it mean? :-) I guess it refers to the implementation, not the code. For pure 2^n you could implement it much more efficiently using ffz() (not that it really matters of course, most orders are 0) -Andi - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
