Re: Route cache performance under stress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



   From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
   Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:21:13 +0200

   On Thu, 22 May 2003 18:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
   "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
   
   > Actually, get_order() aparently only works on powers of
   > two, which 'size' is definitely not.
   
   Are you sure? I always used it on all kinds of sizes.
   
   The algorithm looks for me like it works on any size. A quick test
   confirms that too.

I believe you.

Then what does that comment above it mean? :-)
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux