Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--- Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
> "David S. Miller" wrote:
> > 
> > Bonding does not help with single stream performance.
> > You have to have multiple apps generating multiple streams
> > of data before you'll realize any improvement.
> > Therefore netpipe is a bad test for what you're doing.
> 
> This has always confused me.  Why doesn't the bonding driver try and spread all the
> traffic over all
> the links?  This would allow for a single stream to use the full aggregate bandwidth of
> all bonded
> links.

Because then you risk heavy packet reordering within an individual flow,
which can be detrimental in some cases.
--karthik


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux