Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <20020212.224750.106435646.davem@redhat.com> you wrote:
> I definitely think, if there is any change, it does belong
> in ifconfig.  In fact it should report it as "IFF_PROMISC(%d)"
> so that it is explicit that this is not a binary state.

I will make any modification you suggest. But we anyway need a way to turn
promisc mode off directly (by the administrator).

Greetings
Bernd
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux