Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <20020213.001736.03366378.davem@redhat.com> you wrote:
> Do we just cancel out all the counts if we are asked to clear the
> IFF_PROMISC bit?  That is definitely wrong, it blows away the entire
> intention of having a count in the first place.  Or do we make it act
> as a "decrement 1 count"?  That sounds equally lousy to me.

Well, the method (a new ioctl or something else like sysctl) is not important,
but an admin needs a method to turn the hardware promisc flag offf without
killing the running aplications.

Greetings
Bernd
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux