Re: Making private networks more accessible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have read your proposal and have a few questions:
a) Do you propose a DNS-Extension to use *one* name for an address pair?
b) What about address triples, quadruples and so on? There could be more than
   one Firewall, especially in the peer-to-peer scenario.
c) I would want to propose an option in the IPIP-Packet to reduce the
   possibility of fakes. Your scheme would be no good, if it would be
   possible to penetrate firewalls with it and flood internal computers,
   which are possibly not prepared to deal with it, because they are *not*
   servers, with traffic per guessed addresses. Then no sane router would
   route IPIP.
d) Is there a protocol to make a server known to the firewall (leasing a port)?
e) Is there a protocol to question a firewall for valid servers (if not
   per DNS as per question a)?
f) Is it a good idea to introduce cryptographic options into IPIP or is it
   better to use IPsec instead? (with regard to c)
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux