>You'll find a lot of other functions BTW that do not properly check >*_user return BTW; in some cases it was too difficult to add all the >checks to the whole call chain so it was not done. I would take an >relaxed attitude in LTP at missing EFAULT; perhaps make it a warning >only. > >-Andi > >P.S.: I have a preliminary patch to make 2.4 TCP do full EFAULT again, but >it needs some more testing before I can release it. To be honest, I'm really not too concerned about the EFAULTS myself....I just wanted to know why this was happening. Thanks for the quick learning session and the patch effort though... - Robbie Robert V. Williamson Linux Test Project IBM Linux Technology Center Phone: (512) 838-9295 T/L: 638-9295 http://ltp.sourceforge.net - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
