Re: skb tailroom insufficient handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

> Is there any nicer way to expand the tail that can avoid copies?

No.


> Or better is any way (planned in future kernel relases) that can allow a
> netdevice to specify to the upper layers that it wants to reserve some
> tailroom, similar to hard_header_len?

No.

Until now no examples are known when this is even useful. If you have one,
which could justify abuse for main stream, please, give some details.
It is really interesting.

Alexey
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux