Re: network load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Tuan,

Thank you for such a propmt answer.

> Don't forget you have a transport, network, and link layer header bytes
> that factor into the load on the physical interface.

Yes, 8 (for UDP) + 20 (for IP) + 18 (for eth). Rigth?

> Also, why don't you use usleep() instead of select()?

Ok, never heard of 'usleep()' before.

Do you think this is a valid approach, I mean, is this close 
to a real situation?

Matias.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux