"David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:43:52 -0700 > > I wasn't passing values to setsockopt in network byte order, but > it doesn't look like I should: Do you agree? > > Ummm... "byte order" doesn't matter when you're passing in > just a byte. :-) I was passing a whole integer. I will try passing in just a single byte to see if that changes anything. Maybe an addition could be made to the ip man page to describe the different things that void* should be for different get/setsockopt calls? If there is such a thing, I couldn't find it... -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear@excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
