Re: ARP misbehaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:05:05PM +0200, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> > You need to change your routing so that the 129.187.154.153 route goes
> > through eth1 or alternatively add blackhole policy routing with
> > eth0's address as source address.
> Then my machine could not talk to 129.187.154.153 any more because eth1 is
> on a physically separated network.

If you need to talk to someone on eth0 you should also answer his
arp requests there. You seem to want to answer arp requests on a different
interface than you send packets out, which doesn't make much sense.

> 
> > P.S.: Cross posting this way is very impolite. Don't do it.
> Sorry, I didn't know where this belonged. Is linux-net correct?

linux-net is correct.

-Andi
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux