Re: load balancing default routes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think perhaps this will conflict with the idea as IP protocol, it
does not guarantee the delivery path of a packet, but guarantee
the delivery of a packet. While, if you want to designate the
path of packet delivery , source route will do some help although
its capacity is really poor.

James Shen

>
> Not really an answer to your question but I was also wondering
> about a related topic.  Let's say my Linux server has one ethernet
> card (using IP aliasing) and multiple default gateways to
> get back to the internet.  Is there a way to make my IP packets go
> back to the clients via the same exact gateway that they
> came through?
>
> Thanks,
> Tuan
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Mordechai Ovits wrote:
>
> > I read RFC 1122 section 3.3.1.* on default gateway selection.  It implies
> > that default routes are for failover, not for load-balancing.  And linux
> > follows this.  As long as one of the default gateways is reachable, linux
> > will send traffic to that one only.
> >
> > So, does anyone know of a way to get linux to load balance default routes?
> > It would be best if the loadbalancing was sticky at layer 4, but not required.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mordy
> >
>
>

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux