> (BTW, are you aren't masquerading everything out of each of those > interfaces? Without using something like BGP, I don't see how you > could be multi-homed and carry bare network traffic out into any > of three internet gateways, then have it work to get the traffic > back to you again). Obviously he has to be masquerading because the traffic would never get back to him without him doing some BGP and having an ASN. However the question of switching also intrigues me. I would love to see how to make gated do things internally without consulting upstream routers. But in this case I wonder if one cannot write a simply script that simply pings the respective upstreams and then if the current default does not respond removes the route. I guess one can then configure which is the gateway with highest priority such that when it comes back up it is put back in. The only problem I envision with this approach is that the link to the upstream may be up while the upstream's link to the outside world may not be up. And one cannot use a host out there for their pings since you may get false changes when that particular host is down and it appears as if all your links are down. regards, Noah. > > Cheers > Tony > - > : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
