Re: dev->name in /proc/ioports (was: Re: [patch] NE2000)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > But the only reliable way to query the kernel as to what compiled in ISA
                 ^^^^^^^^
> > net driver is installed is by a model name in /proc/[ioports,interrupts]
> > (Yes, I know, a minor issue...)
> 
> I always use 'dmesg' for this...

It isn't reliable - some installs did a "dmesg -c" at boot IIRC, or the
ring buf may have already wrapped with crud like VFS disk change
messages.

> > Also, the trend for /proc/ioports (and interrupts) in other parts of the
> > kernel still appears to be based on hardware/model names and not kernel
> > device names, e.g. serial and not ttyS*, BusLogic BT-XXX and not scsi0,
> > soundblaster and not /dev/audio, etc. -- hence 3c509 and not eth0 would
> > be consistent?
> 
> Especially for interrupts, it would be much smarter for the other
> devices to indicate their device, since that allows you to differentiate
> between adapters of the same type.

Ok - I still think consistency is a worthwhile goal.  So I guess we 
(in 2.5.x) will have to extend the scope of settling on the device name 
outside of drivers/net (assuming nobody else has sufficient reasons to 
stick with model names instead).

Paul.



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux