RE:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, DEMERRE DIETER wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Johnson [mailto:ioann@cais.com]
> ...
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Johnson [mailto:ioann@cais.com]
> > >
> ...
> > This demonstrates the network seems ok.  Thus we should not
> > consider defaults in the gateway (.1).
> > ...
> > > the Web from this box.) I've configured networking, giving this
> > > box 192.168.0.2, and I tried using my gateway's IP address. When
> > > I try to ping
> > > the gateway machine, I get Destination Unreachable messages.
> > ...
> > ?
> > This way we're assured your eth0 is ON and not defective, since
> > further information provided by you states the route-table seems
> > ok.  
> > 
> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 10:14 PM
> > To: 'DEMERRE DIETER'; linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
> > Subject: RE: 
> > 
> > Can *you* please shed some light by throwing me a glimpse on the
> > output of
> > 
> > /sbin/ifconfig
> > > Sure thing; ifconfig for eth0 follows:
> > 
> > eth0	Link encap:Ethernet Hwaddr 00:A0:CC:5F:CF:6E
> > 	inet addr:192.168.0.2 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > 	UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > 	RX packets:283 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > 	TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txpueuelen:100
> > Interrupt:5 Base address:0xf800
> 
> So indeed, I cannot see what could be the problem, but is it possible
> that the .2 machine runs on 100 and the two others on 10 Mb ? or the
> inverse ? 
> If not, I can't discover the flaw
> 
> ******* Groetjes vanwege ***** Greetings From *******
> Dieter Demerre - http://www.angelfire.com/de/ddemerre
>   ddemerre@acm.org - ext.dieter.demerre@siemens.be
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
> 
> iQA/AwUBOWGrOglG34XnM6kpEQKuNgCg1vwMr7kYa29KMFlPsLBqKr0DOMIAnjTa
> 438o0NpwnlOM5LTc9LXuLZ1W
> =KNVi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Somebody ever told me NOT to use ip-addresses with zero's in it, because
it could cause strange errors etc.
I don't know if it's true, but i'm sure someone will correct me if it's
not.

Greetz Jos Lemmerling

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux