On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 3:07 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Kamal, > > Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:04:29 > -0400: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:27 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Kamal, > > > > > > Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 11 Jun 2020 01:44:54 > > > -0400: > > > > > > > Implemented ECC correctable and uncorrectable error handling for EDU > > > > > > Implement? > > > > > > > reads. If ECC correctable bitflips are encountered on EDU transfer, > > > > > > extra space ^ > > > > > > > read page again using pio, This is needed due to a controller lmitation > > > > > > s/pio/PIO/ > > > > > > > where read and corrected data is not transferred to the DMA buffer on ECC > > > > errors. This holds true for ECC correctable errors beyond set threshold. > > > > > > error. > > > > > > Not sure what the last sentence means? > > > > > > > NAND controller allows for setting a correctable ECC threshold number > > of bits beyond which it will actually report the error to the driver. > > e.g. for BCH-4 the threshold is 3, so 3-bit and 4-bit errors will > > generate correctable ECC interrupt however 1-bit and 2-bit errors will > > be corrected silently. > > From the above example EDU hardware will not transfer corrected data > > to the DMA buffer for 3-bit and 4-bit errors that get reported. So > > once we detect > > the error duing EDU we read the page again using pio. > > Ok I see what you mean, can't you fake the threshold instead? The NAND > controller in Linux is not supposed to handle this threshold, the NAND > core is in charge. So what the controller driver should do is just: > increase the number of bitflips + return the maximum number or bitflip > or increase the failure counter. Is this already the case? > /* threshold = ceil(BCH-level * 0.75) */ brcmnand_wr_corr_thresh(host, DIV_ROUND_UP(chip->ecc.strength * 3, 4)); This how the threshold is set, all it means is that for high BCH levels don't interrupt on low number (less than threshold) of bit_flips. Yes the controller driver only increments correctable ECC count. But due the EDU design an EDU operation is disrupted when the controller interrupts on correctable ECC errors during subpage ECC calculations. Hence the driver needs to read the page again with PIO to transfer corrected data. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: a5d53ad26a8b ("mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for flash-edu for dma transfers") > > > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > Minor nits below :) > > > > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c > > > > index 0c1d6e543586..d7daa83c8a58 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c > > > > @@ -1855,6 +1855,22 @@ static int brcmnand_edu_trans(struct brcmnand_host *host, u64 addr, u32 *buf, > > > > edu_writel(ctrl, EDU_STOP, 0); /* force stop */ > > > > edu_readl(ctrl, EDU_STOP); > > > > > > > > + if (ret == 0 && edu_cmd == EDU_CMD_READ) { > > > > > > !ret > > > > > > > + u64 err_addr = 0; > > > > + > > > > + /* > > > > + * check for ecc errors here, subpage ecc erros are > > > > + * retained in ecc error addr register > > > > > > s/ecc/ECC/ > > > s/erros/errors/ > > > s/addr/address/ > > > > > > > + */ > > > > + err_addr = brcmnand_get_uncorrecc_addr(ctrl); > > > > + if (!err_addr) { > > > > + err_addr = brcmnand_get_correcc_addr(ctrl); > > > > + if (err_addr) > > > > + ret = -EUCLEAN; > > > > + } else > > > > + ret = -EBADMSG; > > > > > > I don't like very much to see these values being used within NAND > > > controller drivers but I see it's already the cause, so I guess I can > > s/cause/case/ > > > > live with that. > > > > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > > > @@ -2058,6 +2074,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, > > > > u64 err_addr = 0; > > > > int err; > > > > bool retry = true; > > > > + bool edu_read = false; > > > > > > > > dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "read %llx -> %p\n", (unsigned long long)addr, buf); > > > > > > > > @@ -2075,6 +2092,10 @@ static int brcmnand_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, > > > > else > > > > return -EIO; > > > > } > > > > + > > > > + if (has_edu(ctrl)) > > > > + edu_read = true; > > > > > > You don't need this extra value, you already have the cmd parameter > > > which tells you if it is a read or a write. You might even want to > > > create a if block so set dir and edu_cmd and eventually a local > > > edu_read if you think it still makes sense. > > > > > > > I needed the value since dma and edu read has multiple conditions like > > oob is not included, buffer is aligned, virtual address is good. This > > indicates to > > the if (mtd_is_bitflip(err)) block that the error was from an edu > > transaction that happened.This way all ecc error handling for dma, > > edu, pio is in one place. > > Also there is more controller version specific logic for read error > > handling in there and this allows us to maintain the hierarchy how we > > handle both correctable > > and uncorrectable error. > > Fair enough. > > > > > > > + > > > > } else { > > > > if (oob) > > > > memset(oob, 0x99, mtd->oobsize); > > > > @@ -2122,6 +2143,11 @@ static int brcmnand_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, > > > > if (mtd_is_bitflip(err)) { > > > > unsigned int corrected = brcmnand_count_corrected(ctrl); > > > > > > > > + /* in case of edu correctable error we read again using pio */ > > > > > > s/edu/EDU/ ? > > > s/pio/PIO/ > > > > > > > + if (edu_read) > > > > + err = brcmnand_read_by_pio(mtd, chip, addr, trans, buf, > > > > + oob, &err_addr); > > > > + > > > > dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "corrected error at 0x%llx\n", > > > > (unsigned long long)err_addr); > > > > mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += corrected; > > > > > > > Will fix all the other typos. > > > > > Thanks, > > > Miquèl > > > > Thanks > > Kamal > > > Thanks, > Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/