On Wed, 27 May 2020 09:22:49 +0200 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Miquel, > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 27 May 2020 > 09:17:58 +0200: > > > Hi Boris, > > > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 26 May > > 2020 23:25:30 +0200: > > > > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 21:17:13 +0200 > > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > The ONFI parameter page of a chip might define more fine grained > > > > tPROG_max and tBERS_max. When we do not have this information, we > > > > default to the highest possible values (they are maxima anyway). > > > > > > > > There is no point setting these fields at runtime, so explicitly move > > > > these defaults to the main ONFI SDR timings structure. > > > > > > Okay, now I see why you're doing that: you want to return the mode 0 > > > entry directly, and it makes sense, but it should be explained in the > > > commit message. > > > > Okay I will mention it in the other commit message, and perhaps move > > the comment about them as well so that it does not get lost. > > > > I can also assign these timings manually for mode 0 in the helper you > > requested. > > Actually I don't like this idea which would mean changing the content > of the timings structure itself... Me neither, they should stay const. > > I would prefer to move these 4 values to the structure (as I already > do) plus moving the comment explaining the derivations. > Agreed. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/