On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:18 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 21 May > 2020 21:10:16 +0200: > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 22:01:58 +0300 > > Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:26:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:12 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:21:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:21 PM Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As these boards have no more users nor testers, and patching them has > > > > > > > become a burden, be that because of the PCI part or the MTD NAND > > > > > > > support, let's remove them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The cm-x300 will for now remain and represent Compulab boards at its > > > > > > > best in the PXA department. > > > > > > > > > > I think this series missed the cm-x270 NAND driver, so this could be > > > > > PATCH 4/3 (not even compile tested). > > > > > > > > > > From 56a11987f82ef8b32b25dfc17b849f9bbbf03e4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 10:09:47 +0300 > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: remove CM-X270 NAND driver > > > > > > > > > > The cm-x270 board have been removed and theres is no point to keep this > > > > > driver. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Thanks! Removing that driver was actually how the discussion started, > > > > so we definitely want to do that. Boris earlier patch "mtd: rawnand: Get > > > > rid of the cmx270 driver" did it by changing the board file, now your > > > > patch is the right thing to do, and we should remember to do the same > > > > for mbxfb. > > > > > > Arnd, will you pick this to the SoC tree or should I resend? > > > > Actually I sent a v2 removing only the MTD driver. You should probably > > sync with Miquel to make sure the same patch is not applied twice. > > Actually I was about the merge this patch in the MTD tree because I > have a big cleanup series which depends on it. Arnd could you confirm > that it's okay for you? Yes, that sounds good. I assume the patch is basically identical to the one that Mike just sent, right? If there are changes to arch/arm, I guess those can be dropped now as I'm merging Robert's patches to remove those board files. Arnd ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/