Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: pxa: remove Compulab pxa2xx boards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 21 May
2020 21:10:16 +0200:

> On Thu, 21 May 2020 22:01:58 +0300
> Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:26:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:  
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:12 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:21:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:    
> > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:21 PM Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:    
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As these boards have no more users nor testers, and patching them has
> > > > > > become a burden, be that because of the PCI part or the MTD NAND
> > > > > > support, let's remove them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The cm-x300 will for now remain and represent Compulab boards at its
> > > > > > best in the PXA department.    
> > > >
> > > > I think this series missed the cm-x270 NAND driver, so this could be
> > > > PATCH 4/3 (not even compile tested).
> > > >
> > > > From 56a11987f82ef8b32b25dfc17b849f9bbbf03e4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 10:09:47 +0300
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: remove CM-X270 NAND driver
> > > >
> > > > The cm-x270 board have been removed and theres is no point to keep this
> > > > driver.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>    
> > > 
> > > Thanks! Removing that driver was actually how the discussion started,
> > > so we definitely want to do that. Boris earlier patch "mtd: rawnand: Get
> > > rid of the cmx270 driver" did it by changing the board file, now your
> > > patch is the right thing to do, and we should remember to do the same
> > > for mbxfb.    
> > 
> > Arnd, will you pick this to the SoC tree or should I resend?  
> 
> Actually I sent a v2 removing only the MTD driver. You should probably
> sync with Miquel to make sure the same patch is not applied twice.

Actually I was about the merge this patch in the MTD tree because I
have a big cleanup series which depends on it. Arnd could you confirm
that it's okay for you?


Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux