Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 21:35, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On Mon, 18 May 2020 21:24:22 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2020 19:50:04 +0200
Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 18:56, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > Let's convert the driver to exec_op() to have one less driver
relying
> > on the legacy interface.
>
> Great work, thanks for that.
>
> However it does not work :( nand_scan() returns error -145.
Looks like the R/B signal is inverted. Can you try with the
following diff applied?
I checked the DT, and the GPIO is indeed declared GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW,
which explain why the test is inverted. Because of DT ABI stability it
might not be an option to change that, but the signal should actually
be
declared GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH.
It depends what you consider what is the active state, is it when
"busy" or "ready"? ;)
I can fix it in the devicetree, and the driver would return
(gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpiod) ^ gpiod_is_active_low(gpiod)) for
compatibility with the old devicetree.
Cheers,
-Paul
--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
index dcecd54af20b..9206792629a8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
@@ -249,6 +249,26 @@ static int ingenic_nand_attach_chip(struct
nand_chip *chip)
return 0;
}
+static int ingenic_nand_gpio_waitrdy(struct gpio_desc *gpiod,
+ unsigned long timeout_ms)
+{
+ /*
+ * Wait until R/B pin indicates chip is ready or timeout
occurs.
+ * +1 below is necessary because if we are now in the last
fraction
+ * of jiffy and msecs_to_jiffies is 1 then we will wait
only that
+ * small jiffy fraction - possibly leading to false timeout.
+ */
+ timeout_ms = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms) + 1;
+ do {
+ if (!gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpiod))
+ return 0;
+
+ cond_resched();
+ } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout_ms));
+
+ return !gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpiod) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
+};
+
static int ingenic_nand_exec_instr(struct nand_chip *chip,
struct ingenic_nand_cs *cs,
const struct nand_op_instr
*instr)
@@ -294,8 +314,8 @@ static int ingenic_nand_exec_instr(struct
nand_chip *chip,
return nand_soft_waitrdy(chip,
instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
- return nand_gpio_waitrdy(chip, nand->busy_gpio,
-
instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
+ return ingenic_nand_gpio_waitrdy(nand->busy_gpio,
+
instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
default:
break;
}
@@ -322,6 +342,9 @@ static int ingenic_nand_exec_op(struct
nand_chip *chip,
ret = ingenic_nand_exec_instr(chip, cs,
&op->instrs[i]);
if (ret)
break;
+
+ if (op->instrs[i].delay_ns)
+ ndelay(op->instrs[i].delay_ns);
}
jz4780_nemc_assert(nfc->dev, cs->bank, false);
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/