On Tue, 19 May 2020 16:52:27 +0200 Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 21:24, Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On Mon, 18 May 2020 19:50:04 +0200 > > Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi Boris, > >> > >> Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 18:56, Boris Brezillon > >> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> > Let's convert the driver to exec_op() to have one less driver > >> relying > >> > on the legacy interface. > >> > >> Great work, thanks for that. > >> > >> However it does not work :( nand_scan() returns error -145. > > > > Looks like the R/B signal is inverted. Can you try with the > > following diff applied? > > Still doesn't work properly. I get -ENODEV in nand_detect(), at the > "second ID read did not match..." pr_info(). > > The R/B signal doesn't seem to be the primary cause, if I use > nand_soft_waitrdy() it doesn't work any better. Well, it does solve the ETIMEDOUT issue, so we're one step further ;-). Can you print the returned ID? > > One thing I noticed that jz4780_nemc_assert() is called with > assert=true unconditionally, while before it was called with (ctrl & > NAND_NCE), whatever that is. Whether or not that's a problem, I have no > idea. Yes, we really want to assert the CE signal unconditionally here, but maybe we should add a delay after asserting it/before de-asserting it. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/