On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:24:17 +0200 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sun, 19 Apr > 2020 14:51:40 +0200: > > > Now that we have a single we can move it to the directory where all > > single source file drivers live. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/{bcm47xxnflash => }/bcm47xxnflash.c | 0 > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/Makefile | 2 -- > > 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > rename drivers/mtd/nand/raw/{bcm47xxnflash => }/bcm47xxnflash.c (100%) > > delete mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/Makefile > > Here are two independent comments: > > 1/ I think calling the file bcm47xxn-nand-controller.c would best fit > todays policy. Sure I can do that. > > 2/ I am not sure there is an interest in doing the merge + > move/rename in separate steps. It's always a pain to follow changes in > a file with git blame when code get's moved around so I would prefer > doing this in a single change, what do you think? Great minds think alike: I was planning to merge those 2 patches in v2 ;-). It's indeed not necessary to do it in 2 steps. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/