Hi Boris,
Thank you so much for review comments and your time...
On 14/4/2020 3:21 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hello Ramuthevar,
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:24:33 +0800
"Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.read_byte = lgm_read_byte;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.read_buf = lgm_read_buf;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.write_buf = lgm_write_buf;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.select_chip = lgm_select_chip;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.dev_ready = lgm_dev_ready;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.cmd_ctrl = lgm_cmd_ctrl;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.chip_delay = 30;
+ lgm_host->chip.legacy.dummy_controller.ops = &lgm_nand_controller_ops;
+
Seriously, what's not clear in [1]? Okay, let's say you overlooked this
comment, isn't the name of the field explicit enough? We received a
few other drivers implementing the legacy interface in the last few
months so maybe there's something to improve on our end (update the
doc, move legacy drivers to a legacy sub-dir?).
Understood the legacy to latest implementation based ->exec_op(), Thanks!
Back to more constructive comment now: please implement ->exec_op() to
replace those legacy hooks.
Agreed, will do the implementation of exec_op() hook and update the patches.
Regards
Vadivel
Regards,
Boris
[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc1/source/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h#L987
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
