Re: [PATCH] Revert "mtd: rawnand: denali: get ->setup_data_interface() working again"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/9/20 11:27 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.

Hi,

[...]

>>>> See attached patch, with which (without this revert) you get this:
>>>> denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE = 0x00001414 -> 0x0000143f
>>>> denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA = 0x0000143f -> 0x00001432
>>>> denali->reg + RE_2_WE = 0x00000014 -> 0x00000019
>>>> denali->reg + ACC_CLKS = 0x00000004 -> 0x00000005
>>>> denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT = 0x00000002 -> 0x00000009
>>>> denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT = 0x00000002 -> 0x00000004
>>>> denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT = 0x00000001 -> 0x00000008
>>>> denali->reg + RE_2_RE = 0x00000014 -> 0x00000019
>>>
>>> OK, the left-hand side is probably the timing
>>> set up by U-Boot.
>>
>> Yep, the timings that work. So now, how do you get to those working
>> timings using the Linux driver ?
> 
> 
> How about
> 0001-denali-more-complicated-calculation-for-timings.patch
> 
> + following ?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> index b0482108a127..ea38aa42873e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> @@ -860,9 +860,9 @@ static int denali_setup_data_interface(struct
> nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
> 
>         /*
>          * Determine the minimum of acc_clks to meet the data setup timing.
> -        * (one additional clock cycle just in case)
> +        * (two additional clock cycles just in case)
>          */
> -       acc_clks = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tREA_max, t_x) + 1;
> +       acc_clks = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tREA_max, t_x) + 2;
> 
>         /* Determine the minimum of rdwr_en_lo_cnt from RE#/WE# pulse width */
>         rdwr_en_lo = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tRP_min, timings->tWP_min), t_x);

Like the attached one ?

That seems to work, but -- the calculated timings differ from the ones
which are calculated by U-Boot and which were tested to work well.
That's not good, I would expect both timings to be identical:
 Denali: clk_rate=31250000, clk_x_rate=125000000
 Denali: tREA=40000
 Denali: tRHW=200000
 Denali: tRHZ=200000
 Denali: tCCS=500000000
 Denali: tWHR=120000
 Denali: tADL=400000
 Denali: tREH=30000
 Denali: tWH=30000
 Denali: tRP=50000
 Denali: tWP=50000
 Denali: tRC=100000
 Denali: tWC=100000
 Denali: tCS=70000
 Denali: tCEA=100000
 Denali: acc_clks=8
 Denali: re_2_we=25
 Denali: re_2_re=25
 Denali: we_2_re=63
 Denali: addr_2_data=50
 Denali: rdwr_en_hi=4
 Denali: rdwr_en_lo_hi=13
 Denali: rdwr_en_lo=9
 Denali: cs_setup=5

 denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE = 0x00001414 -> 0x0000143f
 denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA = 0x0000143f -> 0x00001432
 denali->reg + RE_2_WE = 0x00000014 -> 0x00000019
 denali->reg + ACC_CLKS = 0x00000004 -> 0x00000008
 denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT = 0x00000002 -> 0x00000009
 denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT = 0x00000002 -> 0x00000004
 denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT = 0x00000001 -> 0x00000005
 denali->reg + RE_2_RE = 0x00000014 -> 0x00000019

 denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE = 0x0000143f -> 0x0000143f
 denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA = 0x00001432 -> 0x00001432
 denali->reg + RE_2_WE = 0x00000019 -> 0x00000019
 denali->reg + ACC_CLKS = 0x00000008 -> 0x00000008
 denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT = 0x00000009 -> 0x00000009
 denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT = 0x00000004 -> 0x00000004
 denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT = 0x00000005 -> 0x00000005
 denali->reg + RE_2_RE = 0x00000019 -> 0x00000019

 denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE = 0x0000143f -> 0x0000143f
 denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA = 0x00001432 -> 0x00001432
 denali->reg + RE_2_WE = 0x00000019 -> 0x00000019
 denali->reg + ACC_CLKS = 0x00000008 -> 0x00000008
 denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT = 0x00000009 -> 0x00000009
 denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT = 0x00000004 -> 0x00000004
 denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT = 0x00000005 -> 0x00000005
 denali->reg + RE_2_RE = 0x00000019 -> 0x00000019
...

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
>From 5fd2ee8e18de2490da347d0388481adb18a04408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:16:33 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] denali: more complicated calculation for timings

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
index 5fe3c62a756e..ef5ebb8394f3 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
@@ -218,14 +218,21 @@ static void denali_select_target(struct nand_chip *chip, int cs)
 		return;
 
 	/* update timing registers unless NAND_KEEP_TIMINGS is set */
+	pr_err("denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE), sel->hwhr2_and_we_2_re);
 	iowrite32(sel->hwhr2_and_we_2_re, denali->reg + TWHR2_AND_WE_2_RE);
-	iowrite32(sel->tcwaw_and_addr_2_data,
-		  denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA), sel->tcwaw_and_addr_2_data);
+	iowrite32(sel->tcwaw_and_addr_2_data, denali->reg + TCWAW_AND_ADDR_2_DATA);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + RE_2_WE = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + RE_2_WE), sel->re_2_we);
 	iowrite32(sel->re_2_we, denali->reg + RE_2_WE);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + ACC_CLKS = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + ACC_CLKS), sel->acc_clks);
 	iowrite32(sel->acc_clks, denali->reg + ACC_CLKS);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT), sel->rdwr_en_lo_cnt);
 	iowrite32(sel->rdwr_en_lo_cnt, denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT), sel->rdwr_en_hi_cnt);
 	iowrite32(sel->rdwr_en_hi_cnt, denali->reg + RDWR_EN_HI_CNT);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT), sel->cs_setup_cnt);
 	iowrite32(sel->cs_setup_cnt, denali->reg + CS_SETUP_CNT);
+	pr_err("denali->reg + RE_2_RE = 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", ioread32(denali->reg + RE_2_RE), sel->re_2_re);
 	iowrite32(sel->re_2_re, denali->reg + RE_2_RE);
 }
 
@@ -797,15 +804,6 @@ static int denali_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
 
 	sel = &to_denali_chip(chip)->sels[chipnr];
 
-	/* tREA -> ACC_CLKS */
-	acc_clks = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tREA_max, t_x);
-	acc_clks = min_t(int, acc_clks, ACC_CLKS__VALUE);
-
-	tmp = ioread32(denali->reg + ACC_CLKS);
-	tmp &= ~ACC_CLKS__VALUE;
-	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(ACC_CLKS__VALUE, acc_clks);
-	sel->acc_clks = tmp;
-
 	/* tRWH -> RE_2_WE */
 	re_2_we = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRHW_min, t_x);
 	re_2_we = min_t(int, re_2_we, RE_2_WE__VALUE);
@@ -863,14 +861,39 @@ static int denali_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
 	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(RDWR_EN_HI_CNT__VALUE, rdwr_en_hi);
 	sel->rdwr_en_hi_cnt = tmp;
 
-	/* tRP, tWP -> RDWR_EN_LO_CNT */
+	/*
+	 * tREA -> ACC_CLOCKS
+	 * tRP, tWP, tRHOH, tRC, tWC -> RDWR_EN_LO_CNT
+	 */
+
+	/*
+	 * Determine the minimum of acc_clks to meet the data setup timing.
+	 * (one additional clock cycle just in case)
+	 */
+	acc_clks = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tREA_max, t_x) + 2;
+
+	/* Determine the minimum of rdwr_en_lo_cnt from RE#/WE# pulse width */
 	rdwr_en_lo = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tRP_min, timings->tWP_min), t_x);
+
+	/* Extend rdwr_en_lo to meet the data hold timing */
+	rdwr_en_lo = max_t(int, rdwr_en_lo, acc_clks - timings->tRHOH_min / t_x);
+
+	/* Extend rdwr_en_lo to meet the requirement for RE#/WE# cycle time */
 	rdwr_en_lo_hi = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(timings->tRC_min, timings->tWC_min),
 				     t_x);
-	rdwr_en_lo_hi = max_t(int, rdwr_en_lo_hi, mult_x);
 	rdwr_en_lo = max(rdwr_en_lo, rdwr_en_lo_hi - rdwr_en_hi);
 	rdwr_en_lo = min_t(int, rdwr_en_lo, RDWR_EN_LO_CNT__VALUE);
 
+	/* Center the data latch timing for extra safety */
+	acc_clks = (acc_clks + rdwr_en_lo +
+		    DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRHOH_min, t_x)) / 2;
+	acc_clks = min_t(int, acc_clks, ACC_CLKS__VALUE);
+
+	tmp = ioread32(denali->reg + ACC_CLKS);
+	tmp &= ~ACC_CLKS__VALUE;
+	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(ACC_CLKS__VALUE, acc_clks);
+	sel->acc_clks = tmp;
+
 	tmp = ioread32(denali->reg + RDWR_EN_LO_CNT);
 	tmp &= ~RDWR_EN_LO_CNT__VALUE;
 	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(RDWR_EN_LO_CNT__VALUE, rdwr_en_lo);
@@ -887,6 +910,32 @@ static int denali_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
 	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(CS_SETUP_CNT__VALUE, cs_setup);
 	sel->cs_setup_cnt = tmp;
 
+	/* debug */
+	printk("Denali: clk_rate=%ld, clk_x_rate=%ld\n", denali->clk_rate, denali->clk_x_rate);
+	printk("Denali: tREA=%d\n", timings->tREA_max);
+	printk("Denali: tRHW=%d\n", timings->tRHW_min);
+	printk("Denali: tRHZ=%d\n", timings->tRHZ_max);
+	printk("Denali: tCCS=%d\n", timings->tCCS_min);
+	printk("Denali: tWHR=%d\n", timings->tWHR_min);
+	printk("Denali: tADL=%d\n", timings->tADL_min);
+	printk("Denali: tREH=%d\n", timings->tREH_min);
+	printk("Denali: tWH=%d\n", timings->tWH_min);
+	printk("Denali: tRP=%d\n", timings->tRP_min);
+	printk("Denali: tWP=%d\n", timings->tWP_min);
+	printk("Denali: tRC=%d\n", timings->tRC_min);
+	printk("Denali: tWC=%d\n", timings->tWC_min);
+	printk("Denali: tCS=%d\n", timings->tCS_min);
+	printk("Denali: tCEA=%d\n", timings->tCEA_max);
+	printk("Denali: acc_clks=%d\n", acc_clks);
+	printk("Denali: re_2_we=%d\n", re_2_we);
+	printk("Denali: re_2_re=%d\n", re_2_re);
+	printk("Denali: we_2_re=%d\n", we_2_re);
+	printk("Denali: addr_2_data=%d\n", addr_2_data);
+	printk("Denali: rdwr_en_hi=%d\n", rdwr_en_hi);
+	printk("Denali: rdwr_en_lo_hi=%d\n", rdwr_en_lo_hi);
+	printk("Denali: rdwr_en_lo=%d\n", rdwr_en_lo);
+	printk("Denali: cs_setup=%d\n", cs_setup);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.0

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux