Hello, Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:02:25 +0000: > On 28.02.20 04:11, Yoshio Furuyama wrote: > > The suffix was changed to classify from "g" to "j" between 1st generation > > device and 2nd generation device that's new Serial NAND of Kioxia brand. > > I had to read this sentence multiple times to understand it. Maybe > something like this would be better: > > The suffix was changed from "g" to "j" to classify between 1st > generation and 2nd generation serial NAND devices (which now belong to > the Kioxia brand). > > > As reference that's > > 1st generation device of 1Gbit product is "tc58cvg0s3hraig" > > 2nd generation device of 1Gbit product is "tc58cvg0s3hraij". > > > > The 8Gbit product "TH58CxG3S0HRAIJ" is new line up of Kioxia's serial nand > > and changed the prefix from tc58 to th58. > > Thus it was changed argument to the function from "tc58cxgxsx" to > > "tx58cxgxsxraix". > > Same here. It is very hard to read. I would write something like this: > > The 8Gbit type "TH58CxG3S0HRAIJ" is new to Kioxia's serial NAND lineup > and the prefix was changed from "TC58" to "TH85". > > Thus the functions were renamed from tc58cxgxsx_*() to > tx58cxgxsxraix_*(). > > With an easier to understand commit message: > > Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> Agreed, the commit log proposal from Frieder looks better. The rest of the patch is fine by me though. Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/