On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:18 AM Jef Driesen <jef.driesen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/5/20 5:17 PM, Steve deRosier wrote: > > Looking at the comment in the mentioned commit: "This corner case > > needs to get addressed in the orphans subsystem too." > > > > Was it addressed? Was there a second commit for that? If so, is it > > in your tree? > > I don't see anything relevant showing up with a quick: > > git log ee1438ce5dc4d67dd8dd1ff51583122a61f5bd9e..master -- fs/ubifs/ > > The only fix that refers to that particular commit is this one: > > commit 10256f000932f12596dc043cf880ecf488a32510 > Author: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2019-10-29 20:58:23 +0800 > > ubifs: do_kill_orphans: Fix a memory leak bug > > If there are more than one valid snod on the sleb->nodes list, > do_kill_orphans will malloc ino more than once without releasing > previous ino's memory. Finally, it will trigger memory leak. > > Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when...") > Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> > > But that's about fixing a memory leak, and not the on-disk data. > > > Beyond that, no ideas, it's not a chunk of code I am familiar with. I send a fix for this before I started traveling: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() Digging currently thought all my mails.... -- Thanks, //richard ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/